Thursday, September 30, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Bath Mats Without Suction Cups
Document Risk Assessment. Rls to hard copy or computer?
Pubblichiamo di seguito l'articolo integrale pubblicato dal bimestrale Art. 19 anno 10 n. 2 del Marzo-Aprile 2010. La rivista è edita dal Sirs(Servizio Informativo Rappresentanti dei Lavoratori alla Sicurezza )in collaborazione con Provincia di Bologna, Comune di Bologna, Azienda USL di Bologna, Inail di Bologna, Direzione Provinciale del Lavoro di Bologna, CGIL CISL e UIL di Bologna. L'articolo è stato scritto dal Dott. Leopoldo Magelli cui vanno i nostri ringraziamenti.
RLS and risk assessment: yes copy, no copy, perform like!
Leopold Magee
A recent decision of the Court of Ordinary
Milan (January 29, 2010), section work, the court
dr. Athanasius on the lawsuit brought by
Esselunga against one of its employees responsible for safety
(Marcello Donadello) is of particular interest because it addresses a growing problem
"hot", ie the right of RLS
to dispose of the assessment document
risk, in what capacity (paper or computer), the right
to have plenty of time to consult the
you may bring your document outside
corporate headquarters (now expressly forbidden by the Legislative Decree 81/2008
as amended by Legislative Decree 106/93).
is interesting to quote some passages of the sentence which
on some of these points has full right to
RLS.
1) The court points out, first, that "there is certainly more questionable
the obligation of the employer to deliver to the RLS
DVR (DVR
means the risk assessment document) . It is true that
Esselunga did not intend to steal the DVR
examination of RLS, but did not intend to deliver the same
paper copy of the document, but allowed him to consult
on computer, but only using the computer in
company made available for this purpose.
2) The magistrate, the right of RLS,
recognized by law, to have a copy of the DVR (and its requirement
delivery, so by the employer,
of a copy thereof) means "
the material availability of the document by the RLS.
receiving the document can be done both in paper and electronic form,
but always observed the magistrate, "in this context,
because it is an alternative possibility,
this can only be left to the choice of the RLS
which certainly has the right to ask in what form
prefer to read the document itself. " In this case, the DVR
was a document of 500 (!) Pages, and the RLS was
noted that it was unable to properly exercise his duties
(institutionally and legally applicable)
RLS in the absence of the availability of material in the form paper
the document itself, not being good enough to start reading the
on a computer.
3) Indeed, even the judge noted, the obligation to deliver
required by law is carried out by delivering a
something concrete (the copy of the DVR) and not only by providing
the DVR on a personal computer company only
to consult: so, not by handing a copy of
DVR, is questioning the "prerogatives granted by law to
RLS (art. 50 D. Lgs 81/2008), which requires
an analytical and thorough knowledge of the document in question
.
4) and still remembers the judge: "Do not forget
fact that often the DVR as the present one
consist of hundreds of pages
certainly can not be adequately examined without having the material available".
5) With regard to the fact that the DVR can be accessed only
within the company, according to the magistrate
this does not limit the rights of RLS, but it only makes it less convenient to
usability. It is therefore legitimate, just as the law expressly provides
, the company has ruled out the consultation document
outside of the space business.
6) However, in addition to this statement, the magistrate,
in the last lines of his sentence reads as follows:
"As the role of RLS in the company is set to
defense and control of safeguarding the interests of
primary importance, such as those relating to the health of workers
, it follows that the employer must allow
consultation of the RLS
DVR for as long as necessary, taking into account the possible complexity
the document itself. "
So this is a very interesting decision (it should be noted that
is a ruling of first instance, which can obviously be challenged by
Esselunga
and thus be subject to appeal) that puts in the highest 3-point line
importance
- if the RLS so requests, the DVR must be delivered in hard copy;
- the RLS does not lead out from the DVR, but is required to consult
within the company;
- the RLS should be provided with
as long as necessary for effective consultation document stesso. 
Pubblichiamo di seguito l'articolo integrale pubblicato dal bimestrale Art. 19 anno 10 n. 2 del Marzo-Aprile 2010. La rivista è edita dal Sirs(Servizio Informativo Rappresentanti dei Lavoratori alla Sicurezza )in collaborazione con Provincia di Bologna, Comune di Bologna, Azienda USL di Bologna, Inail di Bologna, Direzione Provinciale del Lavoro di Bologna, CGIL CISL e UIL di Bologna. L'articolo è stato scritto dal Dott. Leopoldo Magelli cui vanno i nostri ringraziamenti.
RLS and risk assessment: yes copy, no copy, perform like!
Leopold Magee
A recent decision of the Court of Ordinary
Milan (January 29, 2010), section work, the court
dr. Athanasius on the lawsuit brought by
Esselunga against one of its employees responsible for safety
(Marcello Donadello) is of particular interest because it addresses a growing problem
"hot", ie the right of RLS
to dispose of the assessment document
risk, in what capacity (paper or computer), the right
to have plenty of time to consult the
you may bring your document outside
corporate headquarters (now expressly forbidden by the Legislative Decree 81/2008
as amended by Legislative Decree 106/93).
is interesting to quote some passages of the sentence which
on some of these points has full right to
RLS.
1) The court points out, first, that "there is certainly more questionable
the obligation of the employer to deliver to the RLS
DVR (DVR
means the risk assessment document) . It is true that
Esselunga did not intend to steal the DVR
examination of RLS, but did not intend to deliver the same
paper copy of the document, but allowed him to consult
on computer, but only using the computer in
company made available for this purpose.
2) The magistrate, the right of RLS,
recognized by law, to have a copy of the DVR (and its requirement
delivery, so by the employer,
of a copy thereof) means "
the material availability of the document by the RLS.
receiving the document can be done both in paper and electronic form,
but always observed the magistrate, "in this context,
because it is an alternative possibility,
this can only be left to the choice of the RLS
which certainly has the right to ask in what form
prefer to read the document itself. " In this case, the DVR
was a document of 500 (!) Pages, and the RLS was
noted that it was unable to properly exercise his duties
(institutionally and legally applicable)
RLS in the absence of the availability of material in the form paper
the document itself, not being good enough to start reading the
on a computer.
3) Indeed, even the judge noted, the obligation to deliver
required by law is carried out by delivering a
something concrete (the copy of the DVR) and not only by providing
the DVR on a personal computer company only
to consult: so, not by handing a copy of
DVR, is questioning the "prerogatives granted by law to
RLS (art. 50 D. Lgs 81/2008), which requires
an analytical and thorough knowledge of the document in question
.
4) and still remembers the judge: "Do not forget
fact that often the DVR as the present one
consist of hundreds of pages
certainly can not be adequately examined without having the material available".
5) With regard to the fact that the DVR can be accessed only
within the company, according to the magistrate
this does not limit the rights of RLS, but it only makes it less convenient to
usability. It is therefore legitimate, just as the law expressly provides
, the company has ruled out the consultation document
outside of the space business.
6) However, in addition to this statement, the magistrate,
in the last lines of his sentence reads as follows:
"As the role of RLS in the company is set to
defense and control of safeguarding the interests of
primary importance, such as those relating to the health of workers
, it follows that the employer must allow
consultation of the RLS
DVR for as long as necessary, taking into account the possible complexity
the document itself. "
So this is a very interesting decision (it should be noted that
is a ruling of first instance, which can obviously be challenged by
Esselunga
and thus be subject to appeal) that puts in the highest 3-point line
importance
- if the RLS so requests, the DVR must be delivered in hard copy;
- the RLS does not lead out from the DVR, but is required to consult
within the company;
- the RLS should be provided with
as long as necessary for effective consultation document stesso.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Autism Spectrum Disorder More Condition_symptoms
Letter from ATA staff
Voghera, July 19, 2010
the attention of the Director General
of the Regional School for Lombardy
Dr. Joseph Colosio E Dr PC Inspector Mario Maviglia
VII
Executive Office of the Regional School for Lombardy
Subject: Transfer Dean Dr. Francis Rubiconto
Gent. Mr. Colosio,
we learned of his decision to transfer the Head of State School "G. Plana" by Dr. Francis Rubiconto Voghera. We do not enter the merits of the decision, but we ask to see her very much because our school would be a grievous loss.
We lived in these years of growth above qualitative Plana thanks to the great professionalism of this manager who was able, over time, create an efficient and compact group of workers to the community.
The boys love it, parents and school staff they consider deeply. That's why we allowed ourselves di disturbarla per chiederLe di annullare questo provvedimento.
Certi di una Sua comprensione, le inviamo distinti saluti.
Il Personale ATA della Scuola Media Statale "G. Plana"
Firmato: Simona Novello, Aquino Rosina, Cignoli Maria Rita, Gioia Gina, Quarleri Marina, Scavotto Giuseppa, Barbera Vincenza, Bernava Gabriella, Calvaruso Marianna, Cipolla Rosa Maria, Civale Teresa, Pavan Monica, Pignatiello Antonietta, Ricco Esterina, Tirelli Gerardo, La Rosa Francesco, Rettani Maria Grazia, Grazioli Marina, Bianco Attilio.
Stomach Acids More Condition_symptoms
Letter of employees of the Manager
the attention of the Director of the Regional School
Dr. Joseph Colosio
E pc to 'Inspector Dr. Mario Maviglia
dell'USR VII Executive Office of Lombardy
We learned of his decision to transfer Dr. Francis Rubiconto, Headmaster of the Secondary School of First Instance "G. Plana" in Voghera. We do not enter the merits of the decision that we were very surprised, however, as unexpected and seemingly without justification.
Over the years the leadership of Dr. Plana Rubiconto the school had a remarkable evolution in terms number and the quality of its Plan of Studies, tailored to different needs of the area. In addition to teaching the curriculum to which special attention is paid by the teachers, the school, at the instigation of the Dean Rubiconto offers various opportunities for personal growth and development not only to pre-adolescents, but also to adults with the presence of a Permanent Territorial Center especially in advanced education for foreigners and the organization of cultural events aimed at all citizens.
In addition, a calm and helpful that the Manager has created between the faculty and staff, confidence and esteem of pupils and families, continuamente confermata da un elevatissimo numero di iscritti.
Pertanto Le chiediamo di rivedere la Sua decisione perché la nostra scuola ne verrebbe profondamente danneggiata.
Certi della Sua attenzione, Le inviamo distinti saluti.
I collaboratori del Dirigente Scolastico
prof.ssa Maria Luisa Faravelli ( Collaboratrice Vicaria) e prof.ssa Elena Torti
Il Presidente del Consiglio d'Istituto
dott.ssa Simona Airò
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)